Foundational Issues in Logical Dynamics
نویسنده
چکیده
A healthy field combines two driving forces, extension of coverage and theoretical reflection – and modal logic is no exception. In this talk, we look at some broader theoretical issues raised by recent developments in dynamic logics of information flow, whose main technical feature is the modal study of definable model change. Our pilot system will be public announcement logic PAL, the base calculus of update with hard information. We identify several general themes behind the particulars of its design. These include model-theoretic issues like the balance of expressive power for the static and dynamic components of the language, and learnability results in the form of preservation theorems. But we also discuss PAL’s calculus of reasoning, via correspondence analysis of its axioms as constraints on update functions in domains of inquiry, showing how this leads to two recent extensions: protocol versions where no reduction to the static base language occurs, and substitution-closed core versions of the system. Both moves exemplify more general operations on modal logics. Next, we consider other dynamic-epistemic logics, and amplify on the above themes, while adding some new ones. First, we discuss event models and product update in DEL, a calculus of model construction that shows analogies with process algebra, but also with the epistemic μ–calculus. Then we turn to dynamic logics for belief change under incoming hard and soft information that upgrade plausibility relations without eliminating worlds. We discuss what logical format best captures the generality needed to avoid a jungle of revision policies. In this setting also, we look at the general phenomenon of defining new static modalities by dynamic considerations. While all this broadens our view of single-step model transformations, another conspicuous dimension in current research is the global temporal horizon of a process of inquiry, a conversation, or a game, adding procedural information to local updates. We discuss representation results linking local dynamic and global temporal logics, while also pointing at specific model-theoretic issues arising with concrete processes involving iterated hard or soft announcements, and their limit behavior. Here we link up with modal fixed-point logics, though the general situation is far from clear. As a very concrete instance of merging local and global perspectives, we discuss some recent links between dynamic epistemic logics and formal learning theory, where modal models acquire a new meaning as priors pre-encoding learning methods.
منابع مشابه
Addressing Issues in Foundational Ontology Mediation
An approach in achieving semantic interoperability among heterogeneous systems is to offer infrastructure to assist with linking and integration using a foundational ontology. Due to the creation of multiple foundational ontologies, this also means linking and integrating those ones. In order to achieve this, we have selected the widely used foundational ontologies DOLCE, BFO, and GFO, and thei...
متن کاملProbability, Fuzzy Logic and bets: foundational issues and some mathematics. Logical Models of Reasoning with Vague Information
متن کامل
Meanings of Foundational Virtue in Islamic Mystical Ethics: A Case Study of Honesty
In mystical ethics, some virtues have a foundational role in relation to other virtues; that is, other virtues are in some ways dependent on, conditional to, or rooted in them. This is a gradational concept, and therefore one can speak of foundational and more foundational among foundational virtues in mysticism. Honesty is the most foundational virtue in mystical ethics, and other virtues are ...
متن کاملFoundational ontology mediation in ROMULUS
An approach for semantic interoperability among heterogeneous systems is to assist with the integration of foundational ontologies. In order to achieve this, we have selected three popular foundational ontologies DOLCE, BFO, and GFO, and their related modules. We perform ontology mediation (alignment, mapping, and merging) on these ontologies by aligning their ontology entities using tools, doc...
متن کاملMathematical Explanation: Problems and Prospects
Since this issue is devoted to the interaction between philosophy of mathematics and mathematical practice, I would like to begin with an introductory reflection on this topic, before I enter the specifics of my contribution. In the past thirty years there has been a marked shift in philosophy of mathematics, due to the appearance of research on aspects of mathematics that were previously ignor...
متن کاملVon Wright's "The Logic of Preference" revisited
Preference is a key area where analytic philosophy meets philosophical logic. I start with two related issues: reasons for preference, and changes in preference, first mentioned in von Wright’s book The Logic of Preference but not thoroughly explored there. I show how these two issues can be handled together in one dynamic logical framework, working with structured two-level models, and we inve...
متن کامل